Lgbt race
Racial Differences Among LGBT Adults in the US
Visit the data interactive
Overview
This final inform in the series, LGBT Well-Being at the Intersection of Race, uses numbers from the Gallup Survey and the Generations/Transpop studies to assess whether LGBT people of color (POC) differ from White LGBT people on several areas of health and socioeconomic well-being. We find that more LGBT people of color report economic instability compared to White LGBT people on many indicators. Additionally, disparities for POC LGBT adults persist in the health domain, except for measures of depression where more White LGBT adults report having depression compared with POC LGBT adults. Further, more women of color who recognize as LGBT reported living in a low-income domesticated, and experiencing unemployment and food insecurity compared to all other groups. We also found differences in outcomes among LGBT POC on some economic and health indicators. Overall, the series of papers show that the relationship between race and LGBT status is a complicated one that differs by outcome and racialized group. Regardless of these complexities, the data point to the need for social and policy inte
LGBTQ+ Identification in U.S. Rises to %
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Gallup’s latest update on LGBTQ+ identification finds % of U.S. adults detecting as lesbian, gay, bisexual person, transgender or something other than heterosexual in This represents an increase of more than a percentage point versus the prior estimate, from Longer designation, the figure has nearly doubled since and is up from % in , when Gallup first measured it.
###Embeddable###
LGBTQ+ identification is increasing as younger generations of Americans enter adulthood and are much more likely than older generations to say they are something other than heterosexual. More than one in five Gen Z adults -- those born between and , who were between the ages of 18 and 27 in -- identify as Diverse. Each older generation of adults, from millennials to the Silent Generation, has successively lower rates of identification, down to % among the oldest Americans, those born before
###Embeddable###
LGBTQ+ identification rates among immature people have also increased, from an average % of Gen Z adults in through to an average of % over the past two years.
Gallup has observed smaller expansion in the percentage of LGBTQ+ identifiers in som
Media Contact: Rebekah Spicuglia, Communications Manager at [emailprotected] or ()
Download the full "Better Together" notify here.
September 15, (New York, NY) – A new, landmark explore on the relationship between racial justice organizations and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) communities finds the lack of resources, funding, and community assist are obstacles to engagement. The study, titled, “Better Together: Research Findings on the Relationship between Racial Justice Organizations and LGBT Communities,” was produced by Applied Research Center (ARC) in partnership with the Arcus Foundation.
There are damaging perceptions about LGBT communities and racial justice groups, specifically that LGBT self and politics are for white people and that communities of color are disproportionately homophobic. "These myths harm LGBT communities of color and continue to be perpetuated by divisive, politically motivated platforms such as the Proposition 8 Campaign,” says Rinku Sen, President and Executive Director of ARC.
"Better Together” is a result of surveys and interviews with more th
Issues of Racial Justice & Inclusion: A Primer for LGBT Movement Funders
By , more than half of Americans will be people of dye – and today, nearly every indicator of well-being shows disturbing disparities according to race. Yet the LGBT movement’s lack of substantive work on issues most relevant to people of color leaves the movement vulnerable to irrelevance and division—and leaves fully one-third of the members of the LGBT society underserved.
This primer aims to inform and motivate LGBT-movement funders to work explicitly on issues of racial justice and inclusion. The primer illuminates general issues of race and ethnicity in American society, discusses why funders aiming for LGBT equality should work explicitly on matters of race, applications recommended philanthropic approaches to racial justice and inclusion (including language recommendations from the Aspen Institute and a model organizational self-assessment from the Annie E. Casey Foundation’s Race Matters Toolkit), and provides recommendations specific to LGBT movement work on racial equity and inclusion.
Also included in the primer’s appendix is information on nearly 50 nonprofit and philanthropic organizatio
.